Saturday, December 25, 2010
Princewill Njong: The Logic of Christmas
Princewill Njong: The Logic of Christmas: "Yesterday, December 24th 2010, a Jehovah Witness lady knocked on my door and I went out to chat with her. She gave me a book titled: 'The Gr..."
Princewill Njong: Farcical panafricanism
Princewill Njong: Farcical panafricanism: "Laurent Gbagbo's desperate cling to power is so pathetic that I can't help but feel tempted to sympathize with him. Pan-Africanism was not f..."
The Logic of Christmas
Yesterday, December 24th 2010, a Jehovah Witness lady knocked on my door and I went out to chat with her. She gave me a book titled: "The Greatest Man who ever lived" and asked me to read the fourth paragraph of the first section bearing the title of the book. The paragraph read
By his dynamic teachings and by the way he lived in harmony with them, Jesus has powerfully affected the lives of people for nearly two thousand years. As one writer aptly expressed it: "All the armies that ever marched, and all the navies that ever were built, and all the parliaments that ever sat, all the kings that ever reigned, put together have not affected the life of man upon this earth as powerfully".
These qualities definitely amount to the divine or supernatural which undermines Jehovah Witnesses' attempt to portray Jesus as not God as seen in their propaganda and representation of Him in the above excerpt in lower case letters.
Secondly, assuming Jesus were not God (if this makes Jehovah Witnesses feel any better), is it still not normal that humanity sets aside a day to commemorate the birth and life of this great Human Being who sacrificed so much for mankind as the above excerpt clearly shows. If Jehovah Witnesses truly believe Jesus did for mankind what armies, navies, parliaments or kings ever did or would ever do, is it too much to gratefully acknowledge this by setting aside a special day to say "thank you". Are Jehovah Witnesses this ungrateful? Hello!!! What is their point or logic?
When we loose a loved one, we often pause sometimes to remember them, even if we don't express this openly or physically, it does happen in our consciousness and subconsciousness; even the Jehovah Witnesses. Do they celebrate birthdays, marriage anniversaries, childbirths, etc? So what is their point? Is it just a matter of church principle just to show them as "different" or as not part of the "grand narrative"? For heaven's sake religion is not fiction! I wish I could understand this manic hypocrisy and prosaic behavior! They do not celebrate the birth of Jesus whom they acknowledge did what no man would ever do, but celebrate the New Year...this is as ungrateful as it gets! I do celebrate Christmas, even in my little room, by pausing momentarily to tell this extraordinary MAN who's done all to me "THANK YOU LORD".
By his dynamic teachings and by the way he lived in harmony with them, Jesus has powerfully affected the lives of people for nearly two thousand years. As one writer aptly expressed it: "All the armies that ever marched, and all the navies that ever were built, and all the parliaments that ever sat, all the kings that ever reigned, put together have not affected the life of man upon this earth as powerfully".
These qualities definitely amount to the divine or supernatural which undermines Jehovah Witnesses' attempt to portray Jesus as not God as seen in their propaganda and representation of Him in the above excerpt in lower case letters.
Secondly, assuming Jesus were not God (if this makes Jehovah Witnesses feel any better), is it still not normal that humanity sets aside a day to commemorate the birth and life of this great Human Being who sacrificed so much for mankind as the above excerpt clearly shows. If Jehovah Witnesses truly believe Jesus did for mankind what armies, navies, parliaments or kings ever did or would ever do, is it too much to gratefully acknowledge this by setting aside a special day to say "thank you". Are Jehovah Witnesses this ungrateful? Hello!!! What is their point or logic?
When we loose a loved one, we often pause sometimes to remember them, even if we don't express this openly or physically, it does happen in our consciousness and subconsciousness; even the Jehovah Witnesses. Do they celebrate birthdays, marriage anniversaries, childbirths, etc? So what is their point? Is it just a matter of church principle just to show them as "different" or as not part of the "grand narrative"? For heaven's sake religion is not fiction! I wish I could understand this manic hypocrisy and prosaic behavior! They do not celebrate the birth of Jesus whom they acknowledge did what no man would ever do, but celebrate the New Year...this is as ungrateful as it gets! I do celebrate Christmas, even in my little room, by pausing momentarily to tell this extraordinary MAN who's done all to me "THANK YOU LORD".
Friday, December 24, 2010
Farcical panafricanism
Laurent Gbagbo's desperate cling to power is so pathetic that I can't help but feel tempted to sympathize with him. Pan-Africanism was not found on dictatorship or despotism-if that's Gbagbo's idea of pan-Africanism, then he's gravely mistaken. Trying to play the Ivory Coast-for-Ivorians' card will not work. Sorry Gbagbo, a true nationalist, a true Pan-Africanist respects and adheres to democratic, intellectual and moral ideals-either of which Mr Gbagbo lacks. Gbagbo can leave now, and preserve some honour and the benefit of doubt of history's sympathy rather than stay on and face the disgrace of being the first African leader to be forced out of office for stealing an election by a fellow African military and/or financial force.
Princewill Njong: The last African Despot?
Princewill Njong: The last African Despot?: "If there is anything we've learned from African leaders since independence, it is that once they get to power, they never want to leave; and..."
Princewill Njong: The last African Despot?
Princewill Njong: The last African Despot?: "If there is anything we've learned from African leaders since independence, it is that once they get to power, they never want to leave; and..."
The last African Despot?
If there is anything we've learned from African leaders since independence, it is that once they get to power, they never want to leave; and always do everything, however mean and shameful to hang on to power. We've also seen, since independence, a consistent pattern of mutual support and tolerance of electoral fraud and violence amongst African leaders. However, what we've never seen post election in Africa, is such a coordinated and prompt response and resolute call by the African Union and ECOWAS on an African leader who's clearly shown to have stolen an election to step down .
Though individual Heads of State have generally remained silent (maybe because they know how they still find themselves in power) and preferred to speak though the AU and other regional organizations, the fact that Africa is acting in unison(so it seems), for the first time, to isolate a despot who's lost moral, spiritual and intellectual judgment because of greed is something to celebrate. For once there's a glimmer of hope that Africa may just be going back to its basics of civilization; that the days of anarchy, impudence and arrogant dictatorship may be numbered; that Africa may finally be maturing and therefore getting more responsible; that dictators and election riggers may finally be held accountable; that the impunity that has characterized African politics since independence may just be terminally ill...
Whether the African and the international community finally prevails over Laurent Gbagbo and his cohorts, the single fact that Africa has acted resolutely responsible for almost the first time is quite comforting. If I could advise Gbagbo, I'd tell him that some African countries may still just be friendly enough to host him and his criminal gang; it's not yet late to get out! Laurent Gbagbo has a rare chance to do the right thing and be on the right side of history; else history will remember him cruelly. The African and international community's response to Laurent Gbagbo is probably the clearest message ever echoed to African leaders and others who still live in despotic fantasies: if Africa and the international community does not relent in its response, Laurent Gbagbo may as well be the last African leader to lose elections and attempt to stay on to power.
Though individual Heads of State have generally remained silent (maybe because they know how they still find themselves in power) and preferred to speak though the AU and other regional organizations, the fact that Africa is acting in unison(so it seems), for the first time, to isolate a despot who's lost moral, spiritual and intellectual judgment because of greed is something to celebrate. For once there's a glimmer of hope that Africa may just be going back to its basics of civilization; that the days of anarchy, impudence and arrogant dictatorship may be numbered; that Africa may finally be maturing and therefore getting more responsible; that dictators and election riggers may finally be held accountable; that the impunity that has characterized African politics since independence may just be terminally ill...
Whether the African and the international community finally prevails over Laurent Gbagbo and his cohorts, the single fact that Africa has acted resolutely responsible for almost the first time is quite comforting. If I could advise Gbagbo, I'd tell him that some African countries may still just be friendly enough to host him and his criminal gang; it's not yet late to get out! Laurent Gbagbo has a rare chance to do the right thing and be on the right side of history; else history will remember him cruelly. The African and international community's response to Laurent Gbagbo is probably the clearest message ever echoed to African leaders and others who still live in despotic fantasies: if Africa and the international community does not relent in its response, Laurent Gbagbo may as well be the last African leader to lose elections and attempt to stay on to power.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
